<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Trading Costs on FX Backtest Diary</title><link>https://etherpoc.com/en/tags/trading-costs/</link><description>Recent content in Trading Costs on FX Backtest Diary</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://etherpoc.com/en/tags/trading-costs/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Why a 0.85% monthly backtest becomes 0.7% in a live account, measured cost by cost</title><link>https://etherpoc.com/en/posts/production-costs/</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://etherpoc.com/en/posts/production-costs/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A system that backtests at 0.85% per month earns about 0.7% in a live account. That is my measured answer, and the interesting part is where the missing piece goes. The monthly return itself barely bends. What deepens is the drawdown, by an extra 1.5 to 2 percentage points, because costs attack the risk side of the ledger before they touch the profit side.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>