<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Statistics on FX Backtest Diary</title><link>https://etherpoc.com/en/tags/statistics/</link><description>Recent content in Statistics on FX Backtest Diary</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://etherpoc.com/en/tags/statistics/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Making "the final call is discretionary" testable</title><link>https://etherpoc.com/en/posts/discretion-verify/</link><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://etherpoc.com/en/posts/discretion-verify/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Since building the &lt;a href="https://etherpoc.com/en/posts/youtube-verify/"&gt;pipeline that extracts trading rules from YouTube videos&lt;/a&gt;, I have verified quite a few video strategies. Every time, I hit the same wall: &amp;ldquo;&lt;strong&gt;the final call is discretionary&lt;/strong&gt;.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You can mechanize the setup conditions, but once the presenter says &amp;ldquo;whether to take it comes down to experience,&amp;rdquo; verification stops there. Discretion works as an unfalsifiable escape hatch.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>