<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Robustness on FX Backtest Diary</title><link>https://etherpoc.com/en/tags/robustness/</link><description>Recent content in Robustness on FX Backtest Diary</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://etherpoc.com/en/tags/robustness/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Five times I doubted the system that won 10 of 11 years, five times the answer was keep it</title><link>https://etherpoc.com/en/posts/robustness-audits/</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://etherpoc.com/en/posts/robustness-audits/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The most frequent verdict I have handed down on my own trading system over the past half year is &amp;ldquo;change nothing.&amp;rdquo; Is the filter symbol right? Shouldn&amp;rsquo;t I add to winning positions? Is the track record just one lucky year? Are the parameter values a fluke? Is it a bug that the system holds a long and a short on the same currency at once? And after I found real bugs in my data pipeline, did the conclusions even survive? Five audits, five different angles of attack, and five times the numbers came back: the current configuration is optimal.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>