<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Monte Carlo on FX Backtest Diary</title><link>https://etherpoc.com/en/tags/monte-carlo/</link><description>Recent content in Monte Carlo on FX Backtest Diary</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://etherpoc.com/en/tags/monte-carlo/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>How the testing works — why can you trust these results?</title><link>https://etherpoc.com/en/posts/method/</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://etherpoc.com/en/posts/method/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Across this site you&amp;rsquo;ll see phrases like &amp;ldquo;vanished in forward testing,&amp;rdquo; &amp;ldquo;failed the M1 intraday check,&amp;rdquo; or &amp;ldquo;Monte Carlo pass rate of X%.&amp;rdquo; Here&amp;rsquo;s what each of those means, as plainly as I can put it. They&amp;rsquo;re all gates designed to keep us from being fooled by a fake edge.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>