<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Mechanizing Discretion on FX Backtest Diary</title><link>https://etherpoc.com/en/tags/mechanizing-discretion/</link><description>Recent content in Mechanizing Discretion on FX Backtest Diary</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://etherpoc.com/en/tags/mechanizing-discretion/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>A trading course coded whole scored PF 1.05, but its horizontal lines alone hit PF 1.63</title><link>https://etherpoc.com/en/posts/yosuga-mechanized/</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://etherpoc.com/en/posts/yosuga-mechanized/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I translated a discretionary trader&amp;rsquo;s paid course into code, rulebook and all. The whole method scored PF 1.05, meaning it earns just 1.05 dollars for every dollar it loses. Nearly break-even. But one by-product of that effort, a way to score how much a horizontal line &amp;ldquo;matters&amp;rdquo;, tested out at PF 1.63, beat my core system on quality, and eventually earned a place in my live portfolio.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>