<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Frontier on FX Backtest Diary</title><link>https://etherpoc.com/en/tags/frontier/</link><description>Recent content in Frontier on FX Backtest Diary</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://etherpoc.com/en/tags/frontier/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Chasing 3% a month means a 70% drawdown, and every smart allocation lost to fixed weights</title><link>https://etherpoc.com/en/posts/blend-frontier/</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://etherpoc.com/en/posts/blend-frontier/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I once asked my own data a simple question: what would a 3% monthly return actually cost? The answer came back as a 70% drawdown, which is another way of saying &amp;ldquo;your account, eventually&amp;rdquo;. And a second finding from the same line of work: five clever schemes for shifting money between strategies all lost to plain fixed weights.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>