<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Drawdown on FX Backtest Diary</title><link>https://etherpoc.com/en/tags/drawdown/</link><description>Recent content in Drawdown on FX Backtest Diary</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://etherpoc.com/en/tags/drawdown/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Making the defense continuous bought 27% more payout at the same risk</title><link>https://etherpoc.com/en/posts/contshock-leverage/</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://etherpoc.com/en/posts/contshock-leverage/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Turn a defensive switch from on/off into continuously variable. That single change chained through eight studies and ended with the prop account&amp;rsquo;s steady-state monthly payout rising from 1.92% to 2.43%, a 27% raise. Risk did not increase; crisis-time ruin probability actually fell.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This article records the whole arc (research notes 223, 226 through 230, plus two follow-ups) as one story, including why each decision went the way it did. An EA improvement is never one number; it is a chain of judgments.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>